Six dimensions, each anchored in named, published psychology. Continuous scores, not boxes. The same answers always produce the same profile. And we'll tell you plainly what we've validated — and what's still on the roadmap.
Each dimension maps to a well-studied region of personality and organizational science. We measure where you sit on a spectrum, never which bucket you belong to.
How you take the lead in an interaction — whether you set the direction and drive the call, or read, adapt, and move with the other person.
How much communication you need to feel in sync — the volume and frequency of contact that keeps you connected versus the quiet that keeps you clear.
The speed you're comfortable deciding and operating at — how much information feels like enough before you move.
How much you reach for process, plans, and predictability — versus trusting yourself to figure it out live.
How you receive challenging information — whether direct feedback lands as a gift or a threat, and how much candor you can hold without bracing.
How finely you read the emotional undercurrent — picking up what's unspoken in a room versus taking people at their explicit word.
A four-letter type forces a 51 and a 94 into the same bucket and pretends they're the same person. They aren't — and the gap between them is exactly what predicts whether two people will mesh or grind.
Same box for everyone above the midpoint. No distance, no nuance.
An exact position on the spectrum — so two “D”s can be 30 points and a world apart.
The scoring is fully deterministic. Re-take it with the same responses and you get an identical waveform. No drift, no mood, no luck.
The same two people always resolve to the same resonance read. It's a measurement, not a daily reading.
Your underlying pattern is steady. We're reading a signal, not catching a mood.
The most common, and fairest, suspicion of any assessment is that it's vibes in a lab coat. Frequency answers it with consistency you can audit by experience: give it the same inputs and it returns the same outputs, every single time. (Consistency isn't the same as proof it predicts outcomes — see our validity posture below.)
Construct-grounded dimensions tied to published psychology, deterministic scoring, and a self-insight experience people consistently find accurate and useful. An aid that informs a human decision.
Longitudinal, outcome-validated evidence linking reads to real-world results. We're collecting it openly and will publish what we find — we won't claim predictive validity before we've earned it.
The fastest way to judge the method is to feel how accurately it reads you.